Lawyer

Medtronic Bladder Stimulator Lawsuit: What You Need to Know

What is a Medtronic bladder stimulator?

A Medtronic bladder stimulator is a medical device that is implanted in the body to treat overactive bladder (OAB), urinary incontinence, urinary retention, and non-obstructive chronic pelvic pain. The device works by sending electrical impulses to the sacral nerves, which control the bladder and other pelvic organs.

Why are people suing Medtronic?

People are suing Medtronic because they allege that the company’s bladder stimulators are defective and can cause serious side effects, including:

  • Pain at the implant site
  • Infection
  • Lead migration
  • Device failure
  • Uncomfortable stimulation
  • Undesirable changes in urinary or bowel function

In some cases, these side effects have required additional surgery or have caused the device to become ineffective.

What are the status of the lawsuits?

There are hundreds of lawsuits pending against Medtronic in the United States. Some of these cases have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) proceedings, which are designed to streamline the discovery process and make it more efficient for the courts to handle a large number of similar cases.

In 2022, Medtronic agreed to pay $28 million to resolve a False Claims Act lawsuit alleging that the company marketed its bladder stimulators for off-label uses and caused physicians to submit false claims to Medicare and TRICARE.

What should I do if I have a Medtronic bladder stimulator?

If you have a Medtronic bladder stimulator and are experiencing any problems, you should see your doctor as soon as possible. You should also contact an experienced medical device attorney to discuss your legal options.

FAQs:

Q: Who is eligible to file a Medtronic bladder stimulator lawsuit?

A: You may be eligible to file a lawsuit if you had a Medtronic bladder stimulator implanted and experienced any serious side effects, such as pain, infection, lead migration, device failure, uncomfortable stimulation, or undesirable changes in urinary or bowel function.

Q: What damages can I recover in a Medtronic bladder stimulator lawsuit?

A: You may be able to recover damages for your medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other losses that were caused by your Medtronic bladder stimulator.

Q: How do I file a Medtronic bladder stimulator lawsuit?

A: To file a lawsuit, you should contact an experienced medical device attorney. Your attorney will help you to gather the necessary evidence and file your case in the appropriate court.

Q: How long does it take to resolve a Medtronic bladder stimulator lawsuit?

A: The length of time it takes to resolve a Medtronic bladder stimulator lawsuit will vary depending on the specific facts of your case and the court system in which it is filed. However, most cases are resolved within one to two years.

Q: What are my chances of winning a Medtronic bladder stimulator lawsuit?

A: The chances of winning a Medtronic bladder stimulator lawsuit will vary depending on the specific facts of your case and the strength of the evidence. However, there have been a number of successful cases filed against Medtronic, and the company has agreed to pay millions of dollars in settlements to resolve these cases.

Q: How much does it cost to file a Medtronic bladder stimulator lawsuit?

A: Most medical device attorneys will work on a contingency fee basis, which means that they will not charge you any upfront fees. Instead, they will take a percentage of your settlement or verdict

Conclusion:

If you have a Medtronic bladder stimulator and have experienced any serious side effects, you should contact an experienced medical device attorney to discuss your legal options. You may be eligible to file a lawsuit against Medtronic and recover damages for your medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other losses.

References:

  • Medtronic Inc. to Pay $2.8 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations Related to “SubQ Stimulation” Procedures: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/medtronic-inc-pay-28-million-resolve-false-claims-act-allegations-related-subq-stimulation
  • Understanding a decade of safety reporting for sacral neuromodulation in the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nau.25248
  • Concerns regarding sacral neuromodulation as a treatment option for medical-refractory overactive bladder – PMC – NCBI: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3147046/
  • Medtronic must face additional Axonics patent challenges, US court rules: https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/medtronic-must-face-additional-axonics-patent-challenges-us-court-rules-2023-08-07/

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *